Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros

Base de dados
Tópicos
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano
1.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 57(3): 529-537, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231761

RESUMO

Clinical trial quality depends on ensuring participant safety and data integrity, which require careful management throughout the trial lifecycle, from protocol development to final data analysis and submission. Recent developments-including new regulatory requirements, emerging technologies, and trial decentralization-have increased adoption of risk-based monitoring (RBM) and its parent framework, risk-based quality management (RBQM) in clinical trials. The Association of Clinical Research Organizations (ACRO), recognizing the growing importance of these approaches, initiated an ongoing RBM/RBQM landscape survey project in 2019 to track adoption of the eight functional components of RBQM. Here we present results from the third annual survey, which included data from 4889 clinical trials ongoing in 2021. At least one RBQM component was implemented in 88% of trials in the 2021 survey, compared with 77% in 2020 and 53% in 2019. The most frequently implemented components in 2021 were initial and ongoing risk assessments (80 and 78% of trials, respectively). Only 7% of RBQM trials were Phase IV, while the proportions of Phase I-III trials ranged 27-36%. Small trials (< 300 participants) accounted for 60% of those implementing RBQM. The therapeutic areas with the largest number of RBQM trials were oncology (38%), neurology (10%), and infectious diseases (9%). The 2021 survey confirmed a pattern of increasing RBM/RBQM adoption seen in earlier surveys, with risk assessments, which have broad regulatory support, driving RBQM growth; however, one area requiring further development is implementation of centralized monitoring combined with reductions in source data verification (SDV) and source data review (SDR).


Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 58(4): 1145-1151, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2173399

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Members of an integrated pharmacy team (pharmacists and pharmacy technicians) have roles that have been identified in the literature as part of the multi-disciplinary cystic fibrosis (CF) care team. One role that has not specifically addressed is the administration of routine and recommended immunizations to people with CF (PwCF). According to care guidelines, PwCF of all ages should be provided all age-appropriate and recommended immunizations. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians can administer immunizations per state laws. The Primary Children's CF Center decided to implement a comprehensive pharmacy-driven immunization care process model to impact immunization rates. METHODS: A 24-month retrospective analysis was conducted with pediatric (≤18 years) PwCF at the Primary Children's CF Center. The primary outcome measures were the percentage (%) of PwCF who received PPSV23, and/or HPV, and/or meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV) immunizations 1-year post-care process model implementation (October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022) as compared to baseline values. The secondary outcome measures are the total number of immunizations, the number of each immunization provided, and the financial impact of pharmacy-driven immunization care process model 1-year post-implementation. RESULTS: During the 1-year post-care process model implementation (October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022), a total of 523 immunizations were provided to 243 pediatric PwCF. The most frequent immunizations provided were PPSV23 (160/523, 31%) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (154/523, 29%). The baseline percentages of eligible PwCF of PPSV23, HPV, and MCV were 27% (58/217), 43% (32/74), and 24% (8/34), respectively. The 1-year post-implementation percentages of PPSV23, HPV, and MCV were 99% (217/218, p < 0.00001), 91% (67/74, p < 0.00001), and 97% (33/34, p < 0.00001), respectively. For COVID-19 immunizations, 56% of eligible PwCF (181/321) have received their first dose. Of these 181 PwCF, 70% (126/181) have received at least one dose of their primary series or booster during the 1-year post-implementation period. The rate of those PwCF who have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 immunization from the age of 6 months to 4 years, 5-11 years, and 12-18 years, was 37% (30/82), 60% (78/129), and 66% (73/110), respectively. For the financial impact generated during the 1-year immunization care process model post-implementation period, 404 non-VFC immunizations were given for an estimated profit of $11,930. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a pharmacy-driven immunization care process model is a way for integrated pharmacy teams to evolve with the CF center care model and have a role expansion in the care provided to PwCF.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fibrose Cística , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Farmácia , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imunização
3.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 622608, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282399

RESUMO

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought on far-reaching consequences for adolescents. Adolescents with early life stress (ELS) may be at particular risk. We sought to examine how COVID-19 impacted psychological functioning in a sample of healthy and ELS-exposed adolescents during the pandemic. Methods: A total of 24 adolescents (15 healthy, nine ELS) completed self-report measures prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effect of COVID-19 on symptoms of depression and anxiety were explored using linear mixed-effect analyses. Results: With the onset of the pandemic, healthy but not ELS-exposed adolescents evidenced increased symptoms of depression and anxiety (ps < 0.05). Coping by talking with friends and prioritizing sleep had a protective effect against anxiety for healthy adolescents (t = -3.76, p = 0.002). Conclusions: On average, this study demonstrated large increases in depression and anxiety in adolescents who were healthy prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, while ELS-exposed adolescents evidenced high but stable symptoms over time.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA